Manufacturing Technology
Article | December 16, 2021
Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) is a technology that revolutionized the manufacturing business. Pierre Bézier, a Renault engineer, produced the world's first real 3D CAD/CAM application, UNISURF CAD. His game-changing program redefined the product design process and profoundly altered the design and manufacturing industries.
So, what is CAM in its most basic definition?
Computer-aided manufacturing (CAM) is the application of computer systems to the planning, control, and administration of manufacturing operations. This is accomplished by using either direct or indirect links between the computer and the manufacturing processes. In a nutshell, CAM provides greater manufacturing efficiency, accuracy, and consistency.
As technology takes over and enhances many of the processes we used to handle with manual labor, we are freed up to use our minds creatively, which leads to bigger and better leaps in innovation and productivity.”
– Matt Mong, VP Market Innovation and Project Business Evangelist at Adeaca
In light of the numerous advantages and uses of computer-aided manufacturing, manufacturers have opted to use it extensively. The future of computer-aided manufacturing is brightening due to the rapid and rising adoption of CAM.
According to Allied Market Research, the global computer-aided manufacturing market was worth $2,689 million in 2020 and is expected to reach $5,477 million by 2028, rising at an 8.4% compound annual growth rate between 2021 and 2028.
Despite all this, each new development has benefits and challenges of its own. In this article, we'll discuss the benefits of CAM, the challenges that come with it, and how to deal with them. Let's start with the advantages of computer-aided manufacturing.
Benefits of Computer Aided Manufacturing (CAM)
There are significant benefits of using computer-aided manufacturing (CAM). CAM typically provides the following benefits:
Increased component production speed
Maximizes the utilization of a wide variety of manufacturing equipment
Allows for the rapid and waste-free creation of prototypes
Assists in optimizing NC programs for maximum productivity during machining
Creates performance reports automatically
As part of the manufacturing process, it integrates multiple systems and procedures.
The advancement of CAD and CAM software provides visual representation and integration of modeling and testing applications.
Greater precision and consistency, with similar components and products
Less downtime due to computer-controlled devices
High superiority in following intricate patterns like circuit board tracks
Three Challenges in CAM and Their Solutions
We have focused on the three primary challenges and their solutions that we have observed.
Receiving Incomplete CAD Updates
Receiving insufficient CAD updates is one of the challenges. If, for example, the part update from a CAD engineer does not include the pockets that are required in the assembly, to the CAM engineer.
SOLUTION: A modeler that enables developers of a CAM programs to create intuitive processes for features such as feature extraction and duplication across CAD version updates. A modeler is capable of recognizing and extracting the pocket's architecture and the parameters that define it. Additionally, the CAM application can enable the engineer to reproduce the pocket in a few simple steps by exploiting the modeler's editing features such as scaling, filling, extruding, symmetrical patterning, and removing.
Last Minute Design Updates
The second major challenge is last-minute design changes may impact manufacturers as a result of simulation.
SOLUTION: With 3D software components, you may create applications in which many simulation engineers can work together to make design modifications to the CAD at the same time, with the changes being automatically merged at the end.
Challenging Human-driven CAM Manufacturing
The third major challenge we have included is that CAM engineers must perform manual steps in human-driven CAM programming, which takes time and requires expert CAM software developers. Furthermore, when the structure of the target components grows more complicated, the associated costs and possibility of human failure rise.
SOLUTION: Self-driving CAM is the best solution for this challenge. Machine-driven CAM programming, also known as self-driving CAM, provides an opportunity to improve this approach with a more automated solution. Preparing for CAM is simple with the self-driving CAM approach, and it can be done by untrained operators regardless of part complexity. The technology handles all of the necessary decisions for CAM programming operations automatically. In conclusion, self-driving CAM allows for efficient fabrication of bespoke parts, which can provide substantial value and potential for job shops and machine tool builders.
Computer Aided Manufacturing Examples
CAM is widely utilized in various sectors and has emerged as a dominant technology in the manufacturing and design industries. Here are two examples of sectors where CAM is employed efficiently and drives solutions to many challenges in the specific business.
Textiles
Virtual 3D prototype systems, such as Modaris 3D fit and Marvellous Designer, are already used by designers and manufacturers to visualize 2D blueprints into 3D virtual prototyping. Many other programs, such as Accumark V-stitcher and Optitex 3D runway, show the user a 3D simulation to show how a garment fits and how the cloth drapes to educate the customer better.
Aerospace and Astronomy
The James Webb Space Telescope's 18 hexagonal beryllium segments require the utmost level of precision, and CAM is providing it. Its primary mirror is 1.3 meters wide and 250 kilograms heavy, but machining and etching will reduce the weight by 92% to just 21 kilograms.
FAQ
What is the best software for CAM?
Mastercam has been the most extensively utilized CAM software for 26 years in a row, according to CIMdata, an independent NC research business.
How CAD-CAM helps manufacturers?
Customers can send CAD files to manufacturers via CAD-CAM software. They can then build up the machining tool path and run simulations to calculate the machining cycle times.
What is the difference between CAD and CAM?
Computer-aided design (CAD) is the process of developing a design (drafting). CAM is the use of computers and software to guide machines to build something, usually a mass-produced part.
Read More
3D Printing
Article | March 14, 2024
Unravel techniques to conquer 3D printing challenges. This piece reveals actionable solutions for 3D printing challenges, envisioning the progressive path forward for 3D printing innovation.
Contents
1. Deciphering 3D Printing’s Complex Landscape
2. The Challenges of Material Limitations
3. Cost Issues and Economic Viability
4. Inadequate Additive Manufacturing Infrastructure
5. Technical Hurdles
6. Workforce Skillgaps
7. Strategic Solutions for 3D Printing Challenges
8. 3D Printing’s Impact on Future of Manufacturing
1. Deciphering 3D Printing’s Complex Landscape
In the dynamic world of manufacturing, 3D printing shines as a beacon of innovation, offering boundless possibilities. However, akin to any revolutionary technology, it grapples with intricate challenges. This article delves into the multifaceted landscape of 3D printing, unraveling various 3D printing software challenges and presents strategic solutions for maneuvering through the additive manufacturing sector seamlessly.
At the forefront of advanced manufacturing, 3D printing commands attention with its unique approach to crafting intricate designs layer by layer. But the question is what is the future direction of 3D printing? And can manufacturers fully answer that without understanding the technical issues in additive manufacturing or common 3D printing problems? To truly comprehend and harness its potential, let’s answer a common yet important question, ‘what are the most common challenges of 3d printing’ and uncover solutions for 3D printing challenges.
The journey begins with an in-depth understanding of 3D printing software, a crucial facilitator translating 3D models into printer-understandable data. Commonly known as slicer software, it dissects models into sections, enabling printers to create objects slice by slice. Used in makerspaces and creative studios, this software plays a pivotal role in the 3D printing process, often collaborating with other design and CAD software. Additive Manufacturing (AM) processes, contrary to subtractive methods, involve adding material until the product is complete. As researchers explore the possibilities of manufacturing with minimal material waste, 3D printing emerges as a viable solution, capable of producing complex and custom objects. The past year witnessed companies leveraging 3D printing to decentralize production, fostering a flexible, resilient, and sustainable supply chain. As of 2023, the 3D printing market size was reported to be $23.2 billion, with a projected compound annual growth rate exceeding 22% from 2022 to 2026. Future trends in 3D printing suggest that the software segment within the industry is anticipated to demonstrate a compounded annual growth of 20% during the period spanning 2022 to 2026. This category encompasses diverse applications and 3D printing software solutions integral to the additive manufacturing processes.
From revolutionizing practices in healthcare, aerospace, automotive and mobility to saving lives with precise 3D-printed models in the medical field, the impact of 3D printing resonates across diverse industries. Despite its advantages, 3D printing presents challenges such as material selection, printing speeds, and accuracy. This article explores 3D printing challenges with a thorough analysis of 3D printing and provides strategic approaches to 3D printing issues to fully experience advancements in additive manufacturing technology.
2. The Challenges of Material Limitations
3D printing is seeing noble innovations across variegated industries, yet challenges persist, particularly concerning material limitations. These challenges encompass a range of issues that impact the effectiveness and versatility of 3D printing technologies. Here, we delve into common 3D printing material limitations:
2.1 Limited Variety of Available Materials
The range of materials suitable for 3D printing is still relatively narrow compared to traditional manufacturing methods. Predominantly, thermoplastics like ABS, PLA, and PETG are used due to their affordability and availability. However, these materials may not meet the requirements for specific applications due to limitations in their mechanical properties and durability. This restriction impacts industries requiring specialized materials, like aerospace and healthcare, where the material's performance is critical. Also, not all plastics or metals can be sufficiently heated or cooled to support 3D printing. In addition, many of the materials cannot be recycled and very few are food safe.
2.2 Inconsistencies in Material Properties
There's a significant gap in the material properties of 3D printed objects compared to those produced by conventional manufacturing. For example, 3D printed ABS plastic exhibits different impact resistance characteristics compared to ABS plastic produced through micro machining or injection molding. This variability leads to challenges in ensuring consistency and reliability, especially in industries like automotive and aerospace, where material performance is non-negotiable. Companies like BASF, Arkema, and DuPont are developing materials such as carbon-reinforced polymers, offering strengths comparable to metals. Markforged's introduction of Onyx FR, a flame-retardant composite, exemplifies such advancements. Yet, these innovations are hindered by material inconsistencies, which challenge the repeatability and reliability of 3D printing.
2.3 Limited Material Development and Database
The challenge of limited material development and database in the 3D printing industry is multi-faceted. The absence of a comprehensive database that details the printing parameters and specifications of various materials hinders the development of a consistent and repeatable 3D printing process. The industry is in need of a robust database that includes information on mechanical and thermal properties, along with specifications for successful printing, to standardize materials for specific applications and increase the reliability of 3D printing as a manufacturing technique. The slow pace of material development and the lack of a comprehensive database have delayed a wider adoption of 3D printing technology.
2.4 High Material Costs and Limited Selection
As of 2024, the economic environment of the 3D printing sector has been significantly affected by disruptions in the supply chain and escalating inflation, resulting in heightened costs and production delays for key materials such as metals and resins. The material costs in 3D printing vary widely depending on the type of material and its applications. For instance, standard PETG costs between $20 to $60 per 1 KG spool, while TPU, known for its flexibility and durability, ranges from $40 to $100 per 1 KG spool. ABS, a popular choice for strength and temperature resistance in FDM 3D printing, ranges from $15 to $20 per kilogram. Comparatively, Nylon, with its flexibility and chemical resistance, is priced higher, ranging from $50 to $73 per kilogram. Polycarbonate, known for its strength and good electrical insulation properties, varies significantly in price, ranging from $30 to $93 per kilogram.
2.5 Material Suitability for Complex Applications
3D printing faces challenges in developing materials that are suitable for complex and high-performance applications. This includes sectors like biomedicine, where materials need to meet specific standards for safety and efficacy. The technology's potential in creating parts with high complexity and functionality across mechanical, biological, and electrical domains is hindered by the limited choice of materials that meet the stringent requirements of these fields. The challenge of seamlessly combining various materials with differing properties into a unified, high-definition 3D printing process continues to be a significant hurdle.
3. Cost Issues and Economic Viability
For organizations contemplating the integration of additive manufacturing, understanding and managing 3D printing cost issues is crucial. A notable challenge in the adoption of AM at an operational level is the lack of established business and cost-calculation models based on AM technology. This absence of precedent can make it difficult for buyers to accurately assess and plan for the full range of costs associated with implementing and maintaining 3D printing technology in their operations.
3.1 Cost Challenges in Different Sectors
Identifying prospects for additive manufacturing reveals that different industries encounter distinct challenges with 3D printing. Different industries face varying challenges when it comes to 3D printing. For instance, the consumer electronics, heavy equipment, and industrial machines industries primarily struggle with the cost of pre- and post-processing. In contrast, healthcare, automotive, and packaging industries grapple with limited material selection. These sector-specific challenges underline the complexity of cost issues in 3D printing. Also, for significant returns on investment in 3D printing software, buyers need to maintain a consistent and ample flow of 3D printing projects.
3.2 Adoption and Utilization Rates
There's evidence suggesting a slower adoption rate of new 3D printing technologies than anticipated. This trend affects the industry’s profit-making ability, as even major players like Shapeways, Velo3D, Stratasys, and Markforged have faced financial instability, indicating difficulties in achieving profitability. The 3D printing sector recently experienced a dip in investor trust, a reflection of the performance of its publicly traded companies. This decline in investor confidence underscores the need for the sector to prove its ability to sustain demand, beating diverse 3D printing’s financial challenges in order to achieve long-term profitability.
3.3 Maintenance and Supply Chain Concerns
As 3D printing technology continues to advance, equipment breakdowns can still occur, necessitating regular maintenance. These maintenance needs and the associated downtime can represent significant expenses, often a concern for investors. Additionally, lingering supply chain issues may require keeping essential parts in stock, leading to increased inventory carrying costs. Another cost factor is post-processing, which almost all 3D printed parts require. This stage of production often involves additional labor, adding to the overhead costs for each unit produced.
4. Inadequate Additive Manufacturing Infrastructure
Inadequate infrastructure stands as a significant barrier, impeding the efficient management of 3D printing operations in numerous companies. The substantial financial outlay for software, materials, training, and facility setup poses a significant barrier, despite the potential benefits of AM. Inefficiencies and errors during the production process emerge due to the lack of integration. Collaborative efforts with AM hardware and software providers can lead to integrated solutions, streamlining workflows and enhancing user experience. Let’s understand infrastructure challenges in 3D printing in greater detail:
4.1 Limited Digital Infrastructure
Insufficient digital infrastructure hampers the efficient management of 3D printing operations in many companies. This deficiency spans across various software aspects, including design, simulation, process optimization, and production management. As a result, workflows become disjointed, leading to inefficiencies and increased production costs. To tackle this challenge, businesses need to invest in specialized workflow management software tailored for 3D printing operations. Such software enables centralized production planning, better traceability, and data synchronization between systems, simplifying the integration of 3D printing into digital manufacturing environments.
4.2 High Initial Investment
The adoption of additive manufacturing (AM) requires substantial financial resources beyond equipment acquisition. This encompasses investment in software, materials, employee training, post-processing equipment, certification, and facility setup. The significant upfront investment often discourages organizations from embracing AM technology, despite its potential benefits. However, efforts are underway to make AM more accessible, with the development of entry-level 3D printers at a fraction of the cost of high-end systems. These initiatives aim to democratize AM technology and make it more feasible for businesses to invest in.
4.3 Workflow Integration Issues
The fragmented nature of the AM ecosystem poses challenges in workflow integration. Companies struggle to navigate disparate solutions and synchronize them effectively. This lack of integration leads to inefficiencies, operational complexity, and higher chances of errors during the production process. To address this, companies are collaborating with AM hardware and software providers to develop integrated solutions that streamline workflows and enhance user experience to deal with common challenges in additive manufacturing. Additionally, efforts to consolidate the AM value chain are underway, aiming to simplify the adoption of AM technology.
5. Technical Hurdles
As enthusiasts and professionals alike delve deeper into this captivating technology, encountering common technical issues is inevitable. Let’s understand the most prevalent problems encountered in both FDM (Fused Deposition Modeling) and SLA (Stereolithography) 3D printing processes, and get equipped with the knowledge and solutions needed to transcend obstacles and achieve printing perfection.
5.1 FDM Printing Inconsistencies
Inconsistent layer adhesion manifests as visible seams or weak bonds between layers, compromising the structural integrity of prints. Warping and curling occur when corners or edges of prints lift from the print bed, resulting in misshapen or failed prints. Also, extrusion problems, such as under-extrusion or over-extrusion, lead to incomplete or excessive deposition of filament, resulting in flawed prints.
5.2 SLA Printing Concerns
Incomplete curing of resin results in soft, tacky prints with poor surface finish and reduced mechanical strength. Delamination can also happen when layers of a 3D print fail to adhere properly, resulting in visible cracks or separation between the printed layers. Various causes like inadequate bonding between layers due to improper print settings, insufficient material compatibility, inadequate surface preparation, or variations in temperature during printing resulting in differential cooling rates between layers can exacerbate adhesion issues and promote delamination.
5.3 Production Speed
One of the primary reasons behind the slower production speed in 3D printing is the layer-by-layer additive manufacturing process. Unlike subtractive manufacturing techniques that can rapidly carve out a final product from a block of material, 3D printing builds objects layer by layer, which inherently takes more time. Additionally, factors such as intricate geometries, print resolution, and material properties can further slow down the printing process.
5.4 Streamlining Post-Production
Post-processing activities, including cleaning, finishing, and support removal, present intricate obstacles that impede efficiency and elevate costs. One critical aspect of post-production in 3D printing is the removal of support structures. While necessary for printing complex geometries, these structures often leave behind residues that require meticulous manual labor to eliminate. Such manual intervention not only prolongs lead times but also escalates production costs, diminishing the cost-effectiveness of additive manufacturing. Moreover, achieving the desired surface finish on 3D printed parts poses another challenge in post-processing. Depending on the application, parts may require smoothing, polishing, or coating to meet quality standards. Manual finishing techniques are time-consuming and labor-intensive, demanding skilled personnel and specialized equipment.
5.5 Quality Concerns
Quality discrepancies in 3D printed parts can have far-reaching consequences, manifesting as functional defects, structural weaknesses, and compromised performance. These issues not only erode product integrity but also escalate the risk of product failure, liability, and associated costs. Additionally, inconsistent quality presents hurdles in regulatory compliance and certification processes, impeding market acceptance and scalability. Notably, issues stemming from bad filament quality, be it due to variations in diameter or length, result in dismal material extrusion rates, yielding substandard 3D prints with potential business ramifications. Such discrepancies can wreak havoc on hardware, especially the extruder, where thin filament leads to inadequate pressure and wide filament strains the extruder motor or hot end opening, thereby jeopardizing 3D printer functionality and print quality.
6. Workforce Skillgaps
One of the primary facets of 3D printing workforce skills gap revolves around technical proficiency. Mastery of CAD software, for instance, is paramount for effective 3D modeling and design. Additionally, expertise in slicing software, which translates 3D models into printable instructions, is essential. Understanding the intricacies of various printing materials is crucial for successful 3D printing operations. Workforce skill gaps must be addressed to realize the full potential of 3D printing.
6.1 Complexity of AM Processes
3D printing involves complex processes such as design optimization to fuel innovation easily with additive manufacturing techniques, material selection, and machine operation. Business leaders must recognize the technical nuances of AM and invest in comprehensive training programs to equip their resources with the necessary skills. Skills in digital design, CAD modeling, materials science, and additive manufacturing principles are essential for effective utilization of 3D printing.
6.2 Integration with Existing Workflows
Integrating 3D printing into existing manufacturing workflows requires a deep understanding of production processes and supply chain dynamics. Cross-functional collaboration and interdisciplinary training can ensure alignment between 3D printing initiatives and organizational objectives. Also, skill gaps may emerge as new materials, processes, and applications are introduced, requiring proactive measures to stay abreast of industry developments. Engaging with industry experts, research institutions, and educational organizations can provide valuable insights and resources for skill development
7. Strategic Solutions for 3D Printing Challenges
Despite 3D printing software challenges, the industry is evolving rapidly, with advancements in technology, materials, and automation. Efforts to bridge knowledge gaps and foster partnerships indicate a promising future for the industry. Companies are actively investing in research and development to overcome existing limitations and unlock the full potential of additive manufacturing.
Following are some precise solutions for diverse 3D printing challenges:
7.1 Technical Hurdles
Technical challenges in 3D printing are akin to solving a multidimensional puzzle where each piece represents a variable in printing precision, software compatibility, and hardware reliability. Overcoming these challenges is critical for advancing the capabilities of additive manufacturing. These difficulties serve as both a barrier and a catalyst for growth. Addressing them requires a deep dive into the complex interplay between software settings, material behavior, and printer mechanics.
7.2 Material Challenges
Material constraints in 3D printing span beyond just availability, touching on aspects of cost, performance, and environmental impact. These can restrict 3D printing's application across various industries. Bridging this gap involves exploring new material compositions and enhancing existing ones to meet specific requirements. The quest for the perfect print material parallels the search for the holy grail in 3D printing.
7.3 Financial Challenges
Securing the financial foundations of 3D printing projects is a daunting challenge that requires a delicate balance between innovation, cost-efficiency, and market demand. Overcoming these obstacles is key to the technology's broader adoption. These hurdles underscore the importance of efficient cost management and investment in innovation. Strategic financial management leads to sustainable business growth with 3D printing processes.
7.4 Infrastructural Issues
Infrastructural challenges in 3D printing, including inadequate digital frameworks as well as integration issues, highlight the need for cohesive systems that streamline the entire manufacturing process from design to production. Building robust infrastructures is crucial for operational excellence. This includes the development of advanced digital ecosystems and the integration of seamless workflows.
7.5 Quality Problems
Quality-related challenges in 3D printing, such as inconsistencies in part strength and surface finish, underscore the necessity for stringent quality control measures and continuous technological refinement. Achieving high-quality outputs in 3D printing is a multifaceted challenge that demands attention to detail in every aspect of the printing process, from material selection to post-processing techniques.
7.6 Skill Gaps
Bridging the skills gap in 3D printing involves addressing the shortage of technical proficiency and fostering an environment of continuous learning and innovation within the workforce. The rapid evolution of 3D printing technology presents this formidable challenge of keeping the workforce adept and well-versed in the latest techniques, necessitating ongoing education and skill development through training programs.
8. 3D Printing's Impact on Future of Manufacturing
3D printing, a transformative force in manufacturing, is reshaping the industry by offering unparalleled efficiency, sustainability, and the potential for customization. This technology is making significant strides, especially in sectors like housing and construction, with innovations from startups such as Tvasta, and extending its influence to the electronics sector through the creation of complex, customized components. The adaptability and cost-effectiveness of 3D printing promises to revolutionize manufacturing processes, moving toward more personalized and customized production, thereby enhancing product quality and fostering innovation in design.
However, the journey of 3D printing toward becoming a cornerstone of future manufacturing is not without 3D printing software challenges. These hurdles encompass a range of technical challenges in 3D printing, from 3D printing material limitations to skill gap challenges in additive manufacturing. Addressing these common challenges in additive manufacturing require a methodical plan to find strategic solutions for 3D printing challenges.
Looking into the future of 3D printing technology, it's clear that despite 3D printing problems and solutions, the industry is poised for growth, driven by advance 3D printing technology and an innovative approach to overcoming 3D printing challenges. The opportunities and challenges of 3D printing highlight the need for continuous learning, cross-sector collaboration, and investment in technology development to surmount cost challenges in additive manufacturing and material limitations.
As we anticipate 3D printing in the coming year, it's crucial to address the biggest challenges within 3D printing processes, which point towards the necessity for industry-wide efforts to address 3D printing issues and ensure a sustainable, efficient future for manufacturing. The potential intellectual property challenges underscore the complexity of 3D printing's impact on future manufacturing. The ease of reproducing protected intellectual property through 3D printing calls for safeguarding companies' interests and ensuring the integrity of the supply chain and product quality. Licensing opportunities present a way forward, aligning production with demand and potentially reducing costs.
In summary, while 3D printing's impact on future manufacturing is profound, successfully navigating its path requires addressing both the primary and secondary challenges it presents. Embracing strategic solutions to these challenges will enable the industry to unlock the full potential of 3D printing, marking a new era of manufacturing characterized by efficiency, customization, and innovation.
Read More